Friday, March 30, 2007

Grum worm poses as IE7 beta

Visit a new Protect-X Sponsors section!

By John Leyden
Hackers are trying to trick prospective marks into loading malware that poses as a "beta" version of Internet Explorer 7.
Widely circulated emails, which pose as messages from admin@microsoft.com and feature subject lines such as "Internet Explorer 7 Downloads", display an image which invites gullible users to download beta 2 of Internet Explorer 7. Users who click on the authentic-looking image download a file called ie7.0.exe infected by the Grum-A worm.
Besides the fact that downloading software advertised in unsolicited emails is a bad idea, surfers might also want to note that the full version of IE7 was released in October 2006 (the bet2 2 version was released in April 2006). Users should go direct to the original developer's site, or some other trusted outlet, when searching for software updates, yet many are yet to learn this lesson, a failing hackers are all too willing to exploit.
Punting malware that poses as software downloads from Microsoft is an all too common trick. The Gibe-F (AKA Swen) worm of 2003, for example, posed as a critical security update from the software giant, fooling many in the process. Two years ago hackers directed surfers to a bogus website masquerading as Microsoft's update site. ®

http://www.protect-x.com/

Retailer sues registrars in $12m domain tasting suit

Visit a new Protect-X Sponsors section!

By OUT-LAW.COM
US retailer Neiman Marcus is suing two domain name registrars for more than $12m over their registration of names containing variations of its brand. The two linked companies are accused of improperly registering more than 40 domain names.
The case takes Name.com and Spot Domains to task over the relatively new phenomenon of "domain tasting". This is the practice of registering domains for five days then cancelling those that do not attract enough traffic. Taking advantage of a five day cancellation period, that practice costs the registering party nothing.
Within that five day period, adverts are published on the pages, and any page that receives enough hits to earn more than the $6 per year domain name registration fee is kept and paid for.
Often the pages involved are slight misspellings of famous names or trademarks which attract people who incorrectly type addresses into their computers.
The case accuses the companies of cybersquatting, trademark infringement, false designation of origin, and unfair competition in the District Court for the District of Colorado. It says some of the domain names registered and offered for sale by the registrars were "confusingly similar" to trademarks that belonged to Neiman Marcus.
The suit also says the sites were used to display adverts for competitors to Neiman Marcus. It says the registrars had no legitimate or fair use of the domain names and did not trade under any name similar to the domains it registered, which included neimancmarcus.com and neimanmarcucs.com.
"Neiman Marcus allege[s] that Defendants' acts are willful and malicious, and intended to injure and cause harm to Neiman Marcus," said the court documents lodged by the firm. It claims damages of $100,000 per domain name registered, which means that the total requested damages amount to more than $4m.
The suit goes on to say that because the alleged behaviour of the two registrars was wilful, Neiman Marcus is entitled to have its damages trebled, to over $12m. In addition to those damages, it says the company will ask for damages relating to trademark dilution and infringement, the amounts of which will be determined at trial.
Neiman Marcus has already taken a successful case against another registrar, Dotster Inc, which that company settled by promising not to register any domains connected to Neiman Marcus or its subsidiary retail chain Bergdorf Goodman.
The practice of domain tasting is said to be increasingly widespread because companies can set up automated systems to register hundreds or even thousands of domains and de-register them automatically. Reports claim that up to six million domains are tied up in tasting systems at any one time.
Copyright © 2007, OUT-LAW.com

http://www.protect-x.com/

Create an .htaccess File to Combat Referral Spam

Visit a new Protect-X Sponsors section!

by Danny Wirken
At present, there is a growing nuisance for users and administrators alike of sites that ruin web servers and more particularly, blogs.This nuisance is being referred to as comment, trackback and referrer spams. Various solutions have been proposed with some being applicable to even two of these forms of spam using a single solution.What is Referral Spam?A referrer request-header file allows the client to specify the address (URI) of the resource from which the request-URI was obtained. It is a way for an HTTP client to send in the headers, the URI of the page that sent them there. This is especially handy for a site administrator to provide insight as to where the traffic on his web server is coming from. It is also depended upon by the most popular web server log analyzers in providing statistics on the most common referrers.The HTTP Referrer: header is very useful but it is also completely arbitrary. Any web browser or HTTP client is free to send a forged Referrer: header with any request to a web server. Spammers have taken advantage of the fact that there is no provision for authentication in SMPTP and have used the existing openness to specially craft request with their website in the Referrer: header.Most people will find it difficult to understand why someone would bother spamming something which only the site administrator will see in the logs. One probable motivation pinpointed is the boosting of search engine ranking. Another is simply to show-up in any stats published by the site. If a site being spammed runs a web server log analyzing software, access to the URL in the top referrer's section is handily obtained by the spammer.A serious consequence of referrer spam is that the process is often performed via an HTTP "GET" or "POST" request which retrieves the entire body of the document being spammed. A 30k document, for example, will have all the 30k transferred across one's Internet pipe. This results to not a small amount of traffic in the web server which could be very costly since bandwidth is not cheap.Referrer spam wastes CPU and disk space and can be a source of endless annoyance to server operators. It is being actually fought by search engine developers thus its initial effectiveness in boosting a site's ranking has been considerably lessened. However, the problem persists and much has to be done to conquer it.Some recommended practices in countering the threat of referral spam include the non-publication of referrers by bloggers, inclusion of the page in robots.txt when referrers have to be published, use of the rel="no follow" attribute and gathering a cleaner list of referrers using JavaScript and beacon images. Some bloggers have begun fighting referrer spammers at the .htaccess level. Others have even taken steps to automate this.Blocking Users by Referrer NotesA very useful feature of .htaccess is the ability to block users or sites that originate from a particular domain. When there are tons of referrals from a particular site with no single visible link to one's own site from the said site, the referral probably isn't a legitimate one. The other site is most likely hot linking to certain files such as images, CSS file or other file. The blocking access by referrer in .htaccess requires the help of the Apache module mod rewrite to be able to make out the referrer first. There is a fear that spam would still come in even as .htaccess continue to grow. Blacklisting certain referrers in .htaccess is another option, the effectiveness of which has been greatly diminished due to the ease by which spammers are able to register thousands of domains and rotate them as quickly as they are blacklisted.The .htaccess generator to prevent people from certain IP addresses, domains or even countries from gaining access to a site or to specific folders can be used. The full IP address has to be typed to block a specific IP. The use of a partial IP address is required to block a range of IPs. Blocking a particular domain can be done by typing the domain without the www. The tail extension is to be typed when blocking a country.There is no limit to the entries that can be added one at a time. The "add" should be checked after each entry while the generated code is to be copied and posted into a plain text file. This file is then named .htaccess. The "." Before the file name should be noted as well as the absence of any tail extension.If there is already an .htaccess file in the root of the docs directory or the folder where it is to be applied, the generated code shall be added to the end of the current .htaccess file, taking extra care not to disturb the existing code. It will then be uploaded in ASCII mode.The rel = "no follow" solutionA coalition of blogging and search engine companies have joined together to support an HTML attribute designed primarily to combat comment spam but have high potentials as well for effective use against referral spam. This attribute is known as the rel ="no follow" is being praised by many bloggers as the ultimate solution for the prevailing problem. The idea is simple enough with the hardest part being the matter of convincing the major players such as Google, Yahoo! and MSN to agree on it.Tagging a link with rel ='no follow" attribute would prevent any contribution to the site's PageRank. This means that comment and referral spammers will not be rewarded for their illegitimate activities on websites that implement the attribute. The problem gets solved partially but this solution is unable to end it.This truth is sought to be explained by the fact that it is impossible to reach a 100% adoption thus there will always be an incentive to spam. Spammers essentially do not care whether their techniques are specifically effective as long as they are generally effective. They need no particular reason to hit any site and will do so as their main target is the blogosphere as a whole. It is also quite unfortunate that the resources required to fight spam, particularly referral spam, is far bigger than the resources needed to create it.Referral spam is an HTTP request. The client doesn't even need to acknowledge the response. All it may need is a simple packet with formatted text.Spammers take pains to make a request look legitimate. The user - agent string would look very much like MSIE. It used to be that spam came from a single IP but things have definitely gotten more complex since then.Filtering referrer IPs against spam blacklisting can also be done. Listing the referring URL in any section of a site's web stats should be avoided if the IP is blacklisted. Do not pursue query once a given site is identified as a referral spam host name.

http://www.protect-x.com/

ICANN rejects .xxx

Visit a new Protect-X Sponsors section!

By Burke Hansen
In an unusual open board meeting today, ICANN once again rejected the establishment of a .xxx top level domain (TLD). The vote was 8-4 with a single abstention, that of CEO Paul Twomey.
The open meeting provided an opportunity to hear a debate that in the past had been conducted behind closed doors.
The debate seemed to follow attitudes hardened by years of politics surrounding the issuance of the domain. The debate raged largely around the phony issue of whether a .xxx domain would put ICANN in the content regulation business, when rejecting the domain is itself a content regulation decision.
Those opposed to the domain repeatedly issued proclamations about the supposed lack of proof that it would provide a "responsible" forum for adult entertainment.
The dissenters pointed out the ludicrous hypocrisy of this position, particularly in light of the fact that ICANN had previously approved the contract, and emphasised over the course of the week that promoting competition in the TLD business has become its central mission.
They said what ICANN really needs is a truly content-neutral TLD approval process, one with clear standards that apply equally for all TLD applicants. Standards such as meeting the technical and financial requirements, which are black and white and are not subject to political pressure from government or government-connected moralizers.
The opponents of .xxx went to great pains to emphasize that political pressure had nothing to do with their decision, although the only other rational explanation were the qualms board members felt over the concept of the .xxx domain - although they practically tripped over themselves claiming that they were voting to keep ICANN out of the content regulation business.
ICANN should only reject domains for moral reasons in the rare circumstance that they are universally opposed - that would truly promote competition in the TLD racket, and once and for all get ICANN out of the content regulation business. ®

http://www.protect-x.com/

Thursday, March 29, 2007

ClickCard Offers Prepaid Access to Online Adult Videos for English Market

Visit a new Protect-X Sponsors section!

by Q. Boyer
A new prepaid card for accessing online adult videos has hit the market in England, designed to allow users to purchase online content without providing a credit card number or other personal information.ClickCard, currently offered for sale at various locations in London, Radlett, and Watford, grants its purchasers access to a collection of adult movies via www.clickcarduk.co.uk. Each card contains a unique number that is not exposed until a protective covering is scratched away by the purchaser.“It is not just a question of a possible financial loss,” said Yohai Nir of ClickCard, according to 24Dash.com. “There may be other reasons why people may not want to divulge their personal details when accessing websites, especially those with adult content.”Once a ClickCard’s code has been activated, time starts to be deducted from the card’s time allocation. The time period for ClickCards currently ranges from one day (₤2.99, roughly $5.87 USD) to a month-long card (₤19.99, approx $39.27 US), according to the ClickCard website.Yohai said that ClickCard plans to expand the range of websites and content available through its prepaid card and service, but that “initially we are concentrating on the Adult market.”Although the total amount of adult content available to ClickCard users is fairly limited, Yohai said the content accessible via the card provides “for just about every taste.” Yohai added that both the company and the selection of videos available will expand as new content partners and point-of-sale outlets are added to the mix.“The intention is to offer a wide range of retailers and service providers to our card users,” said Yohai, according to 24Dash.com. “As the number of major companies coming on board increases, so will the outlets where the cards can be purchased.”

http://www.protect-x.com/

ICANN fires back with stern threat of legal action...again

Visit a new Protect-X Sponsors section!

By Burke Hansen in Lisbon
Without any fanfare, or even notice of an ongoing lawsuit against itself, ICANN posted another letter to RegisterFly on Wednesday giving it notice (again) of an intent to pursue legal action against the disintegrating registrar.
This was not posted in the blog section, where one would expect to find it these days - it was buried in the correspondence page. The letter once again threatens legal consequences against the wayward registrar if it does not shape up.
If it sounds like you've read this before, you have. Only two weeks ago, ICANN had its high-powered attorneys at Jones Day fire off a similar letter, which has led (if ICANN's much-touted new website is to be believed) to another...letter.
It almost makes one wonder if ICANN is in such a sorry state it can only afford to have Jones Day do its correspondence, rather than its real legal work. ®

http://www.protect-x.com/

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Sex.com Hires Del Anthony to Oversee Major Overhaul

Visit a new Protect-X Sponsors section!

By Steve Javors
LOS ANGELES — Sex.com will undergo a complete reorganization and restructuring of its business model, parent company Escom LLC announced.
To oversee the site’s new direction, Escom has hired Del Anthony as its CEO/President. Anthony formerly served as chief operating officer of Video Secrets.
Under Escom’s ownership, Playboy has managed the site’s content, but with the hire of Anthony all the site’s operations, including a new affiliate program, will be brought in-house beginning April 1.
Escom plans to give Sex.com a major facelift in the coming months, Anthony told XBIZ. The site will depart from its current form as a banner farm to a “more refined, mainstream, adult-friendly, user-powered portal and social network.”
The new Sex.com site will be Web 2.0-powered, and will offer videos, photos, shopping, sex news, community, survey statistics and more.
“Our goal is to turn the domain into what it should be — a world class destination and online society for all things adult; expect a complete metamorphosis,” Anthony said. “We are going to build the site into an enormously powerful brand. Sex.com will appeal to a much broader market segment, with more focus on women users, and shake loose the negative stigma associated with adult sites.”
Anthony said that Sex.com has inked high-profile partnerships with content partners that will be announced April 1, adding that while Sex.com always will be an adult site, its new push will be to bridge the gap to mainstream and make it more women and couples friendly.
The company is looking for more companies to partner with that have products with mass appeal. Sex.com is offering white label opportunities, and interested companies are encouraged to call Anthony.
“The site will be refreshing, lively and unconventional,” Anthony said. “We are going to completely redo our image to be unique, informed, lifestyle driven and socially networked. These are just some of the concepts visitors will associate with the site in the future. This new positioning will help us expand the brand way beyond merely driving Internet traffic to the world’s best domain.”
In order to invigorate its total overhaul, Sex.com is looking for experienced adult industry professionals to fill numerous roles including an affiliate manager and marketing director. Anthony said that the company’s hired a mainstream branding firm to expand the reach of the Sex.com name.

http://www.protect-x.com/

What's Important to Search Engines and What's Not

Visit a new Protect-X Sponsors section!

by Jill Whalen
I recently had an inquiry from someone who was looking for some possible SEO consulting with me. He was in the process of a redesign and wanted to be sure not to make any mistakes along the way, which is super-smart! The time to be looking at SEO is definitely in the beginning stage of any design or redesign project.The interesting part of the email was this person's misconceptions about what he thought were important factors for the search engines. I'd like to share those points with you, with my comments following each one:Little or no Flash.This is a huge misconception to many who are trying to design search-engine-friendly websites. There's nothing inherently wrong with using Flash and no reason to avoid it altogether. What you do need to avoid is an *all-Flash* site, as well as Flash navigation. But that's it. And even if you have those things, there are workarounds.All scripts should be called from external files.This is a great idea to keep file size down and make it easy to update your pages, but it's got nothing to do with search engines or how your pages are ranked within them. Search engines have long known how to ignore code that is of no use to them. Whether your scripts are right there in the source code of the page or called up externally will have no bearing on your rankings or search engine relevance.The site should be designed using CSS as extensively as possible.Another myth. CSS doesn't have any special properties that search engines like better than tables or any other HTML code. Again, it may make it easier for you to update your pages, or to use your content for other things, but it's not an SEO technique that will increase rankings or relevance.The CSS should be called from external files.Same as calling up scripts in external files -- nice to do, but not a search engine issue in the least.There should be no comments in the code. It should be added to an FAQ or Doc-type file.Why not? I'm not sure where this myth came from, but I suppose if you're thinking that file size is going to affect your search engine rankings, you might also believe this one. It may have also come about because some people used to think that adding keyword phrases to comment tags would help search engine rankings, even though it didn't. Comment tags have long been ignored by the engines, and because of this, you can use them as much or as little in your source code as you would like. I always comment out bits of text and code that I no longer wish to use but that I may want to add backin later. It's absolutely, positively not a problem! A large percentage of the code on each page needs to change from page to page so that the search engines don't see the pages as duplicate content.Nope. You certainly do NOT have to change the code in your pages to avoid duplicate-content issues! Website templates have code that is exactly the same from page to page. This is good and normal and certainly fine with the search engines. One would have to think that the search engineers were really dumb if they were going to penalize pages because they used the same design template from page to page! Sure, you don't want the same exact *content* on every page of your site, but even that is not generally a problem if it's a few sentences here and there. All picture links should have text links under the pictures.No reason for that at all. Image links that make use of the image alt attribute (aka "alt tags") have always been followed easily by the search engines and will always continue to be followed. They're followed even without the alt attribute, but the words you place in there tell the search engines and the site users exactly what they'll be getting when they follow the link. It's essentially the same thing as the anchor text of a text link.Do not use drop-down or fly-out menus using JavaScript.This is fairly good advice; however, there are very easy workarounds if you have to use JavaScript menus for some reason. The "noscript" tag is a perfectly legitimate place to recreate your menu for those who (like the search engines) can't do JavaScript. I've been using this technique since 2000 or so when my website was designed with JavaScript menus, and it's definitely not a problem. I just haven't gotten around to redesigning my site with a more crawler-friendly navigation. Certainly these days, a CSS menu would be a better option.Must use basic HTML link navigation (textual navigation, no JavaScript mouse-over, and no image map graphical navigation).Yes and no. JavaScript links are definitely a no-no. But there are plenty of crawler-friendly image maps, and like I mentioned previously, graphical links are A-OK with search engines.All pages must be validated by an HTML validator and all style sheets need to be validated through a CSS validator.Why? This has nothing to do with search engines. It's nice to do, though.The majority of the site will be static, as static pages are easier for search engines to crawl and rank properly.'Fraid not. Dynamic pages are just as easy to crawl and rank as static pages. Most websites today are dynamic because they're simply easier to maintain. The search engines have figured out how to crawl and rank them just fine for many, many years now. It's true that there are specific things you need to watch out for when creating a dynamic site, but most developers are aware of the worst of the issues. You certainly should consult with an SEO if you're changing content management systems, or ifyou're having problems getting your dynamic URLs spidered and indexed. But there's no reason to have only static pages on your site because you're worried about the search engines being able to index dynamic pages.The site needs to be browser-compatible and screen-resolution-compatible.This is another thing that's nice to do for your site visitors, but it has no bearing on search engine rankings or relevance. Phew! I hope this helped clear up a lot of misconceptions that anyone else may have had. Please don't get me wrong -- I do agree that most of the things listed here are great design tips that can help you to create an awesome, user-friendly website. I just want to make it very clear that they have nothing to do with SEO, rankings, spidering, indexing, etc.

http://www.protect-x.com/

PayPal Seeking New Security Against Phishing

Visit a new Protect-X Sponsors section!

by John Martellaro
PayPal is asking Internet e-mail providers for their cooperation in a new technology to deter phishing scams, according to InfoWorld on Tuesday.
The technology, called DomainKeys, was developed by Yahoo Inc. It allows the verification of the sender and the integrity of the sent message. If bogus, a message that might have otherwise passed a filter test, will be blocked.
Increasingly sophisticated phishing scams often appear to be sent from Internet banking sites, like PayPal, but are really from sites, often outside the U.S., that seek to obtain "verification" data, that is a user's account name and password.
"So far, no agreements have been reached, but the idea is one that PayPal would like to see from other e-commerce businesses," said Joseph E. Sullivan, PayPal's associate general counsel recently. "I think one lesson we've learned is that education isn't going to stop this.... Phishing attacks are too good now. Every company that does business on the Internet is being targeted by phishing scams now."
TMO tip: In Apple Mail, place the cursor over any suspicious URL that appears to redirect to a Website. A yellow box will reveal the true URL, which will likely be different that shown in the e-mail if it's a scam. If it shows a strange, foreign, or dotted quad IP in the root, it's very likely a scam.

http://www.protect-x.com/

Scammers target domain name owners.

Visit a new Protect-X Sponsors section!

By John Leyden
Fraudsters are targeting domain owners in a new spam-based scam. Typically the sophisticated fraud, which is still under investigation, starts with an email message to domain owners offering to purchase a domain. Prospective marks are directed to a forum ostensibly set-up to discuss domain appraisal services. These discussions are bogus and held on a "static HTML page that is meant to look like a forum discussion", the SANS Institute's Internet Storm Centre warns. The ruse directs users to a particular service, securenamesale.com, which sells "domain appraisal software" for $99. Even if the victim pays for an appraisal certificate from securenamesale.com the spammers renege on their promises and the domain goes unsold. The objective of the scam is geared towards racking up affiliate revenues from securenamesale.com by tricking victims into using the designated domain appraisal service in the hopes of scoring a lucrative sale that never materialises. A representative of Arizona-registered securenamesale.com said it is not involved in the scam, which it blamed on rogue affiliates. "Our security department is checking the situation. Looks like one of our affiliates is using illegal marketing methods. His affiliate account will be cancelled," Andrew Gordon, site manager of securenamesale.com, told El Reg. Fraud targeting domain name holders are far from new. In February 2001, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) went to court to stop a scam that attempted to trick potential marks into registering variations of their existing domain names. At least 27,000 website owners were victims of that scam, the US consumer watchdog estimated. More recently, jailed UK spammer Peter Francis-Macrae (AKA Weaselboy) used data from Nominet's Whois database to mount a bogus domain re-registration scam. ®

http://www.protect-x.com/

Yahoo! customers will get unlimited email storage from this May.

Visit a new Protect-X Sponsors section!

By John Oates
Punters already get 1GB but plunging costs of storage technology mean the company can now remove the upper limit. The company says most of its users don't get anywhere near the upper storage limits anyway.
The offer is for personal, non-commercial use only - users will have to follow a fair-use policy. The company will consider extending the extension to other Yahoo! services like its photo hosting service Flickr.
The deal is worldwide but excludes China and Japan, according to Reuters. In the case of China, this should make it easier for Yahoo! to keep track of dissidents' email, should it want to.
Yahoo!'s UK press office was not returning phone calls this morning but the company's blog tells us: "When Yahoo! Mail launched 10 years ago, users got a whopping 4MB of storage for their entire mailbox. Today, you would fill that up with a single picture from your weekend." Total capacity when Yahoo! launched its mail service was 200GB for all accounts. Yahoo! users originally got just 4MB of storage.
The blog warns that "anti-abuse" measures will be put in place and that the roll-out will likely take some months.
Other email providers are expected to follow suit shortly.

http://www.protect-x.com/

Monday, March 26, 2007

Yahoo's mobile search now available to all

Visit a new Protect-X Sponsors section!

Nancy Gohring
Yahoo opened up its mobile oneSearch offering to anyone with a phone who can access the Internet. The service, which aims to offer more than a simple list of search results, was previously available as part of Yahoo Go for Mobile, a mobile phone-optimized content offering that is compatible with only certain handsets.
With the expanded launch on Tuesday, Yahoo isn't hiding which company represents its biggest competition. A button called "Dare to Compare" on the oneSearch Web site opens a 21-page document containing screen shots that compare the results of a Google mobile search with a Yahoo oneSearch mobile search.
Rather than displaying lists of links as search results, oneSearch pulls up a range of results, including news headlines, images, business listings, and reviews. In the comparison document, a Yahoo oneSearch for "pizza" results in first an advertisement, then the name, address, and phone numbers of two nearby pizza restaurants followed by a list of categories, such as "carry out and take out," "pizza," and "restaurant." Other information that follows falls under categories like Flickr photos, news articles, Web images, products like pizza stones and movies.
The service is designed to make searching for and finding information as quick as possible, Yahoo said.
OneSearch does offer more than competitive mobile search offerings, said one analyst. "It's very different and perhaps does give better search results than you'd see on Google," said Jill Aldort, an analyst with The Yankee Group. "But that said, it's hard to change the consumer mindset, which is so used to the dominant Google on the PC. I see it being a struggle for Yahoo to change that in mobile."
She's in the process of finishing a consumer survey about mobile search. Among teenage respondents, Google has a "huge" lead over any other search provider on mobile phones, she said.
The mobile search market has been heating up recently. Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft have all begun offering search services tailored to mobile-phone users. "It's all about capitalizing on any possible ad revenue they can get," Aldort said. With billions of mobile users around the world -- far more than the number of PC users -- the companies are hoping to reach a new audience with their mobile search offerings, she said.
The online giants are competing against handset makers like Nokia that often include their own search mechanisms in phones as well as startups like Medio Systems that offer search services that mobile operators can self-brand. In some cases, they may also be competing against the mobile operators. While some operators have partnered with the online search companies, others offer self-branded search mechanisms or prefer to try to control which sites users visit rather than enable them with search applications.
With the launch on Tuesday, 85 percent of mobile phones on the market can use the service, Yahoo said. OneSearch is initially available to users in the U.S. and Yahoo plans to roll it out in additional languages and countries in the coming months.

http://www.protect-x.com/

101 Muscular Ways to Get More Targeted Traffic

Visit a new Protect-X Sponsors section!

by Doug Purcell
I decided to put together a blog post about traffic because whatever you are doing online you have to get traffic…. period. If you are not getting traffic, then there is no way you can monetize off your site. Therefore, I decided to put together a blog post for all you freebie seekers :). Some of these techniques you may already know which is great. However, are you applying them? If not then when will you? You just have to stop being lazy and actually apply these techniques ;).Implement this techniques on your website and make hope to make money online more stronger, Okay, so here is the list, hope you enjoy. If you feel that this blog post will help anyone then feel free to pass it around, but the article must remain in tact the way it is, enjoy.101 ways to get more traffic1. Write and submit articles :). It is a classic, but it works. This will be indefinite traffic stuck in the search engines for you. Write quality unique articles, not articles that are rehashed or provide no insight to readers, which is a huge problem these days.2. Write and submit press releases, think prweb after you do one.3. Write and ping blog entries. Always make sure to link back to your website with your blog posts. Try making multiple blogs and have them all link back to one main site.4. Make sure your website is listed in: DMOZ : http://dmoz.org/5. Advertise your website in the appropriate categories at Craigslist. Try posting your ads in the most populated cities in the world.6. If a niche related forum that you frequently visit allows signatures, then make sure to add your website url in there.7. Make sure to view related products on Amazon.com. You can try and take some customers from your competitors here by providing your own url if the product is similar.8. Review websites in your niche on Alexa to try to take some of their traffic by including a reference back to your site.9. Review some related products on epinion.10. If you purchase a product that you actually like, then feel free to give an individual respect when respect is due and leave a testimonial. You should be able to get some traffic from that website if your testimonial is left with a url.11. Whenever you send an email to someone, always add your website url as a signature.12. Keep updating content on your websites/blogs… try at least once per week.13. Tag blog posts at social bookmarking sites, especially at http://del.icio.us/.14. Add photos to your blog with appropriate keywords.15. Tag blog photos at Flickr.16. Politely ask your readers to subscribe to your rss feeds.17. Try coining your own term. Might want to trademark it if you smell that it will become popular.18. Encourage readers to comment on your blogs.19. Include translation for your websites/blogs, especially in Chinese.20. Do not be boring, write about something that a wide select of people would want to know about.21. Make sure to edit your writing (unlike what im doing :D).22. Comment on other related blogs.23. Make a custom 404-error page for your website. You can provide a link back to your main website or even try to monetize it by offering a related affiliate program within your niche.24. Sponsor a charity, most charities will link back to your website, and you are also doing a good deed :).25. Sell an item on eBay as a charity auction. Most charities will link back to both your auction and your main website.26. Start a publicity campaign, do something that individuals in your niche will take note of.27. Brand your website with a logo and a slogan/catch phrase. Think IBM.28. Hold a crazy contest that people in your niche will talk about. This will equal more links and traffic to your website.29. Build a tool that individuals in your niche will love and enjoy. Then give it away for free. If the tool is helpful, then you will get quality one-way links to your website.30. Contact small newsletters sources offline and submit articles to them.31. Become friends with editors of an offline publication.32. Give speeches offline. Start small and local. Also, do not forget to participate in toastmasters meetings in your area.33. Have a great product. All of the marketing/advertising in the world will do you no good if your product is sub par.34. Make something innovative. If you are selling information, what makes your content something you cannot get from the local bookstore, Barnes and noble or even eBay for that matter?35. Is your product groundbreaking? Will you leave individuals with no choice but to talk about your product or service?36. Are you selling something that wide groups of people want to know about but there is limited/scarce knowledge?37. Write good content, if your writing is good then people will share it with their friends. In addition, webmasters will use it as content on their website with a reference back to your article, or at least they should.38. Spark emotions. If you get people emotional about something then they will most likely talk about it.39. Get a custom t-shirt made with your website url on it, and wear it often.40. Build a list of subscribers. Your list is like a golden asset to you if utilized correctly.41. Write tip articles, such as “Ten easy tips to blank-blank-blank.”42. Buy traffic from the search engines by utilizing one of their PPC campaigns.43. Open up a myspace account and find targeted friends so that you can promote your services to them. Do not spam people, myspace is cracking down on spammers and are starting to sue people.44. Solicit a link from your local chamber of commerce.45. Have an easy to remember domain name. If your domain name is too long or not memorable then people may forget your site.46. Add a bookmark option to your website/blogs.47. Purchase the misspelled versions of your domain name and have it redirect to your main one.48. Use keywords in your image alt tags.49. Make sure to include appropriate keywords in your title tag, search engines show more prominence or importance to keywords here.50. Place appropriate keywords in your anchor text when linking.51. If you have a profile anywhere online, always include appropriate keywords and link back to your website.52. Try to get links from websites within your niche with a high pr (pagerank). Some webmasters say that pagerank is not important, but do not listen to them, they have no idea what they are talking about :). The more one-way links (inbound links/backlinks) you have to your website, the higher your pr will become. Pagerank is important because websites with higher prs tend to have a higher search results in Google. It is a no brainier that if you can get number one for a competitive keyword then you will have enough traffic that you can handle… oh by the way its all free targeted traffic to remind you.53. Outsource grunt work. Time is in essence money…. you can hire individuals at freelance services to send emails, request JV proposals, or to answer questions from prospective or current customers.54. Offer something for free. Abracadabra is not the magic word, free is. It is like a worm on a pole for a fish in the water…. its bait! Offer a free mini course or free ebook to help collect more subscribers. You can always offer a backend to monetize on this opportunity, such as an affiliate product for example.55. After someone orders from you offer a one-time offer that compliments your product. For example, if I offered a traffic ebook, then after the individual purchase it would make sense for me to offer a traffic conversion bonus for a limited time only.56. Become the virus within your niche. Make yourself the bug and have people talking about your product. When people talk about your product then you can induce the viral effect. However, you must give people a reason to talk about you, and being like everyone else is not one.57. Do your research and find expensive niches to tap into. A good way to do this is to find how expensive someone is paying for a keyword on a PPC search engine. If you can sell items that are more expensive more often then it is a quicker way to get rich :D.58. Become an active respected member of niche related forums. You can do this by offering quality posts. Hint Hint, it is not the number of posts you make, it is the quality. Remember, quality or quantity. Many useless or negative posts will have people looking at you funny.59. Test, test, test. Your flushing money down the toilet if your not testing to see what campaigns are bringing you in the most money compared to which ones are costing you money. When you test, you can eliminate the campaigns that are costing you dollars so that you can properly maximize your marketing efforts. Without proper testing, you are pretty much lost and can’t improve. You can only guess to what has or what is working. With proper testing, you do not guess, you know.60. Stay up to date on what is going on in the world, you can monetize off hot topic trends.61. Network, when you know more people you can find people that can help you get what you need.62. Offer an affiliate program for your product or service. Make sure to let your satisfied customers know that you have one, if they like your product then they will be even more delighted to know that they will get money for referring you.63. Write and give away a free ebook or report. It does not have to be long as long as its quality information neatly formatted and put together. You can also make a brandable ebook or report and allow affiliates the opportunity to brand their affiliate links in there to pass on to the next individual. You can then send this ebook to your subscribers or submit it to ebook directories.64. Add viral components to your blog such as social bookmarking options, and a refer a friend option.65. Be funny, people like something that will make them laugh and they will spread it for you if it is a genius idea.66. Syndicate your content by using an RSS feeds on your website.67. Answer people’s questions on Yahoo! answers with a link to your website in the sources area.68. Put a link in the “about me” section of your eBay profile.69. Make and upload a viral video to you tube. Use appropriate keywords in the video description for your target audience.70. Record an informative podcast and submit them to poplar podcast directories.71. Provide helpful answers for Google adsense on their help forum with a link back to your website. Go here to check it out: http://groups.google.com/group/adsense-help72. Get people to comment and add content to your site. When they do this, they will provide you unique content, no need to pay for ghostwritten articles.73. If you cannot get JVs, then try to bribe webmasters for sponsored advertising space on their newsletters.74. Include a media section on your website so that you will give the media an easy way to stay up to date on what your company is doing.75. Try to teach a class at your local community college or university. The more exposure you get in the public, the more credibility you will receive.76. Make a screensaver and make it easy for individuals in your niche to download it. Have eye candy graphics combined with your company logo to brand yourself.77. Write something controversial and spread it freely to your target market. It can be something as idiotic as the Da Vinci code, but as long people talk about it, its a successful campaign. A few hints, something controversial is something that goes against established beliefs in your market.78. Write and publish a book. Having your own book is a quick way to gain credibility.79. Take a guru in your niche out to lunch, and pay for it.80. Start an organization or club about something. This can be done online through Yahoo! or Google groups.81. Volunteer. Donate your time to a good clause…you can always network with people and form connections at the same time.82. Get involved in your community and try to run some type of outreach program.83. Offer good customer service, you may be surprised on how many referrals you get just be having a reliable one.84. Consider adding a direct mail marketing campaign to your marketing arsenal.85. Put an ad in your local yellow pages to get some local customers. Yellow pages tend to be more successful then newspaper ads because individuals are looking for a particular service when they are browsing through the yellow pages as opposed to newspapers.86. Post bulletins in your local supermarket. However, since not everyone may carry a pen or pencil, place your contact information and url on strips on the bottom so that individuals can rip it off and take it with them.87. Host your own commercial so you can put “as seen on TV” on your products.88. Conduct surveys and publish them. These make you appear as an expert in your field of study.89. Break a record or shoot to be in the Guinness world records for something.90. Make a sitemap for your website.91. Use a favicon for your site.92. Make your visitors more involved in your website. You can help accomplish this by adding CGI scripts to your site.93. Make sure you have no broken links on your site, and make sure that your website shows clearly in all browsers.94. Find domain names that get traffic, purchase them, and have them redirect to your website.95. Spell correctly whenever using keywords in writing.96. Look at sites related to your niche to try to figure out how they get their traffic.97. Properly optimize your website for the right keywords.98. Try to avoid java scripts on your website as much as possible.99. Do not use frames on your websit.100. If your website becomes popular and starts getting lots of traffic, try switching to a dedicated server. The longer you site is down equals the more lost visitors you will have.101. Write a quality 101 article about a steamy topic that people want to know more about in your niche ;).Thank you for reading and hope you learned something new, im figuring that you at least learn three things new. It may not seem like a lot but those 3 things can help you out big time.

http://www.protect-x.com/

Windows Mail bug may expose Vista users

Visit a new Protect-X Sponsors section!

By Joris Evers Staff Writer, CNET News.com
A possible security vulnerability in Windows Mail could let attackers run applications on PCs running Vista.
An attacker could send an e-mail with a malicious link that, when clicked on, would execute a program on the PC without warning, according to a description of the problem published Friday on a widely read security mailing list called Full Disclosure. Windows Mail is the successor to Outlook Express, Microsoft's free e-mail client, and ships with Vista.
Microsoft is investigating the issue, a company representative said in an e-mailed statement. "As a best practice, users should always exercise extreme caution when clicking on links in unsolicited e-mail from both known and unknown sources," the representative said.
Depending on what the malicious link tells Windows Mail to do, the threat to Vista users could be significant, said Dave Marcus, security research and communications manager at software maker McAfee. "Theoretically, attackers can do a lot of things; they will be able to pass any command through it," Marcus said.
However, the risk is mitigated because Vista is not widely used, Marcus said. "I don't think they will see a lot of exploitation simply because there is so little Vista deployed," he said. "I think Microsoft would take this seriously and wrap this up in their next patch."
Vista has been available to consumers since late January. Since then, Microsoft has issued one security update for the operating system to repair a "critical" vulnerability in the scanning engine for Windows Defender, the built-in antispyware tool.
Microsoft is not aware of any attacks that actually attempted to use the newly reported Windows Mail vulnerability, it said. Upon completion of its investigation, the company could issue a security update or provide guidance in another way, the representative said.

http://www.protect-x.com/

Will Google's Pay-Per-Action Ease Click Fraud?

Visit a new Protect-X Sponsors section!

By Nicholas Carlson
Google is beta testing a different business formula for its AdSense product that eases up on its lucrative pay-per-click model in favor of a pay-per-action model. The new program could help address the click fraud problem that dogs the per-per-click sector of the online ad industry.
The idea with the beta test is to provide advertisers more latitude with ad contracts by stipulating payment only for pre-determined actions that result from a Google ad, such as a certain product purchase or signing up for a newsletter.
Could the pay-per-action model help Google lead the way in addressing the industry's problem with click fraud? It could, if advertisers are provided more certainty that they are being charged for clicks made by humans, rather than automated programs, for example.
Traditionally, Google and other search players charge advertisers using a pay-per-click model, getting paid when an Internet user goes to an advertiser's site through a link in a search provider's ad.
In the latest AdSense beta from Google, publishers are able to choose whether they want to participate in the pay-per-action test on their sites. If they do, publishers can select between an individual ad, a shopping cart of ads, or a specific term or phrase that is relevant to their site's content, a Google spokesman told internetnews.com. Prior to ads being shown on their site, publishers can view the specifics of the ad, including company name, logo and products or services being sold.
Pay-per-action ads are shown only on Google AdSense for content sites. The test is exclusively available to U.S. advertisers who must also already be using conversion tracking or be able to implement conversion tracking code on their Web site so that Google can track completed actions.
Once advertisers sign-up for and are selected by Google to participate in the beta test, they can can create text or image ads in addition to using Google's new text link ad format, which are brief text descriptions that take on the characteristics of a publisher's page.
Ben Edelman, a consumer advocate who spearheaded a class action lawsuit against Yahoo over click fraud in May 2006, told internetnews.com that advertisers who choose to participate in Google's pay-per-action beta test might be able to put some worries to rest.
"Any kind of online advertising is going to be vulnerable to some kind of scam. Picking a method to track and charge for advertising comes down to balancing risks. What Google has proposed so far seems like a reasonable balance of risks." Edelman said.
He said the main benefit of the pay-per-action model over the pay-per-click model for advertisers is that publishers can no longer make money by clicking on or paying others to click on advertisements on their own site.
Google Product manager Rob Kniaz insists, however, that fighting click fraud had nothing to do with Google's decision to test the pay-per-action model.
"We didn't think of it in the scope of click fraud at all. This was purely in response to what advertisers told us," Kniaz told internetnews.com.
But don't be surprised if Google's new product helps to address the issue. Yahoo is making similar moves to let advertisers know it hears their concerns. The search and media portal just announced the appointment of Reggie Davis to vice president of marketplace quality. Yahoo said the new position is part of the company's efforts to address click fraud, traffic quality, network placement and other marketplace quality issues.

http://www.protect-x.com/

Porn sites, faith groups unite against 'dot-xxx'

Visit a new Protect-X Sponsors section!

By ANICK JESDANUN, Associated Press
Online pornographers and religious groups are in a rare alliance as a key Internet oversight agency nears a decision on creating a virtual red-light district through a ".xxx" Internet address.
The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, which has rejected similar proposals twice since 2000, planned to vote as early as next week on whether to approve the domain name for voluntary use by porn sites.
The decision ultimately could hinge on whether ".xxx" has the support of the adult-entertainment industry -- and many porn sites have been strongly opposed.
"One of the criteria is that it (must) have general support among the industry it's supposed to serve, and it does not," said Mark Kernes, a board member with the industry trade group Free Speech Coalition. "I have not met one single webmaster or adult video producer that is in favor of '.xxx,' and I've met a lot of them."
Porn sites are largely concerned that the domain name, while billed as voluntary, would make it easier for governments to later mandate its use and "essentially ghettoize sexual information on the Web," Kernes said.
ICM Registry Inc., the company behind the proposal, has vowed to fight any government efforts to compel its use and cited preregistrations of some 76,000 names as evidence of support. Kernes said many Web sites reserved names simply to prevent someone else from having it.
The Free Speech Coalition believes a domain name for kid-friendly sites would be more appropriate.
Given its voluntary nature, ".xxx" is unlikely to have much effect on parents' ability to block porn sites.
And because a domain name serves merely as an easy-to-remember moniker for a site's actual numeric Internet address, even if a government were to mandate its use, a child could simply punch in the numeric address of any blocked ".xxx" name.
Religious groups worry that ".xxx" would legitimize and expand the number of adult sites, which more than a third of U.S. Internet users visit each month, according to comScore Media Metrix. The Web site measurement firm said 4 percent of all Web traffic and 2 percent of all time spent Web surfing involved an adult site.
"They will keep their '.com' domains, and I have no doubt they will buy their '.xxx' as well," said Patrick Trueman, special counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund, a Christian public-interest law firm. "There will be twice as much pornography on the Internet."
Trueman and other critics say ICM will be the only beneficiary. The startup, founded and funded by four entrepreneurs with backgrounds in domain names and U.K. Internet companies, plans to charge $60 to register a name -- 10 times the fees for ".com." Ten dollars of it would go to a companion nonprofit group that would set policies for ".xxx" use and recommend business practices for combating child pornography and promoting child safety.
The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers tabled and effectively rejected a similar proposal in 2000 out of fear the ".xxx" domain would force the agency into content regulation.
ICM resubmitted its proposal in 2004, this time structuring it with a policy-setting organization to free ICANN of that task. But many board members worried that the language of the proposed contract was vague and could kick the task back to ICANN. The board rejected the 2004 proposal last May.
ICANN revived the proposal in January after ICM agreed to hire independent organizations to monitor porn sites' compliance with the new rules, which would be developed by a separate body called the International Foundation for Online Responsibility. ICM revised it again a month later to clarify ICANN's enforcement abilities and to underscore the independence of the policy-making body.
Despite the vocal opposition, ICM Chairman Stuart Lawley said he preferred a quick vote, adding that the complaints come from "the same people saying the same things time and time again."
"ICM has done more to demonstrate the existence of a strong community than any other application the (ICANN) board has approved," Lawley said. "We have been singled out for special treatment. From the word 'go,' ... we were put in the slow lane."
If approved, ICM would be required to help develop mechanisms for promoting child safety and preventing child pornography, and porn sites using ".xxx" would have to participate in a self-rating system, labeling sites based on such criteria as the presence of nudity and whether it is in an artistic or educational context.

http://www.protect-x.com/

Monday, March 05, 2007

Adobe Continues Market Move with Free Online Photoshop

Visit a new Protect-X Sponsors section!

CYBERSPACE -- Free software is like crack for computer geeks -- and Adobe's Photoshop is one of the higher grades of refined photo editing software, outside of the reach of many smaller pocketbooks. No more, thanks to an innovative new push in the software-as-a-service direction by the software giant.According to News.com, not only will an entry-level version of Photoshop become available online -- but it will be free of charge and easier to use than Photoshop Elementals. Likely to be ad-supported, the online version of Photoshop is expected to be offered via a partner, like fellow Adobe products Remix and Create Adobe PDF Online are currently, although it is possible that it will directly hosted if the dollars look right. The market for web-based application delivery is increasing, with Adobe's latest lean and mean product going up against the likes of Google, Microsoft, and Corel. Experts anticipate programs that provide limited by quality functionality that will strengthen the brand without cutting into its market share among professionals.

http://www.protect-x.com/

Use Yahoo! Pipes to Increase Online Sales

Visit a new Protect-X Sponsors section!

by Rok Hrastnik
While RSS end-user adoption has been relatively slow, marketers have jumped at the chance to use this new internet channel increase their online sales.If you're new to the world of RSS --- RSS is a simple technology that allows you to deliver your online content directly to your subscribers, other websites and the search engines. It helps you improve your content delivery, as well as increase your online traffic and reach, and even conduct business intelligence more easily.RSS content is delivered through so-called RSS feeds, which are just simple files that carry your online content. Each of these simple files containts multiple "stories" that you may want to deliver to your audiences, called "content items". A content item can be anything … an article, a blog post, a whole newsletter issue, a sales letter and so on.But there is more to RSS than simply getting your content out.One of the fields of RSS marketing is also NewsMastering, which allows you to:[a] take multiple third-party RSS feeds,[b] mix them together,[c] filter your new mix using various keywords that you're interested in,[d] use the mix and your filters to create a new stream of content, pulling together all the content items from dozens or hundreds of other RSS feeds … but only the content items that match your filters.You can now take this stream of content and either subscribe to it yourself, if for example you want to find out immediately what the market is saying about you, what it's saying about your competitors, and what your competitors are doing themselves.Or you can take this stream of content and display it on your website to:[a] enrich the visitor experience, by giving them access to the latest and most relevant list of content from your field, such as the latest news in the field you are covering … and do so automatically;[b] by doing so also making your website more search engine friendly, thus increasing your rankings.But up until now doing all of this was quite complicated and really wasn't accessible to most internet marketers.But no longer so ...Yahoo! Pipes Changes The Landscape Yahoo! Pipes is the latest offering from Yahoo!, finally bringing the premise of NewsMastering to the mass market, and actually putting it on steroids.The general idea behind Yahoo! Pipes is to allow its users to "easily" connect various internet data sources, mix them together in various ways, add additional functionality to them and create a new single output, pertaining directly to your settings.While this may sound alot like the standard RSS aggregation and filtering we mentioned above, it actually goes much further than anything on the market in enabling you to manipulate outside sources and come up with a new content output, all of this in a visual programming environment.The "old services" simply allowed you to combine various RSS feeds, set some basic rules on how you want to get content from them, such as limiting the output to only the content items that match your keywords and removing duplicates, and get a new single RSS feed from them. You could then subscribe to this RSS feed in your RSS Reader (for business intelligence purposes) or use it to display its contents on your website.But Yahoo! Pipes goes much further.[BTW - in the Yahoo! Pipes glossary, a pipe is an output you create from mixing and manipulating various content sources][a] Aggregate and Filter any XML FeedAggregate any kind of XML feed, not just RSS, which means that if your application provides an XML data output, you can now aggregate that data feed with other different feeds you might be interested in, and create a single RSS feed that you can subscribe to in your RSS Reader. Just as an example, imagine having an RSS feed that brings you various data from your organization in a single output, such as the latest sales data from your webstore, latest account of company expenses, notifications of new employees, important team communications, your website visitor counts and so on. It even lets you combine other pipes into a new single pipe.[b] Content ManipulationApply various filters, such as a keyword content filter to give you only the content you're interested in, sort, count, truncate, join or even create your own filters. It even lets you add your own input fields. For example, you could create a pipe that aggregates all the RSS feeds from top online retailers, and include an input field that allows you to enter the name of the product you want the latest deals on, and then creates an on-the-fly output with the latest deals for this product. Essentially, it allows you to add simple or advanced search functionalities to filter out only the content you're really interested in ... from hundreds or even thousands of content sources.[c] Social ApplicationsBrowse through pipes created by other users to either use them as an end-user, or use their pipes to create your own new pipes. It of course also allows you to make your own pipes public and even provide them as a service to end-users.There are really almost countless opportunities of what you can do with Yahoo! Pipes, and various new applications will surface when the service gets some milage.The best part is, you can either create your own application that you use when the need arises from the Web, or an RSS feed that you subscribe to in your RSS Reader, to constantly deliver to you the content that you want. Or you can use the RSS feed to display that content on your website.All of this is done through a visual interface, which might be daunting for the average user, but shouldn't present a problem to marketers that either have the time to learn the ropes or pay a little something to a person that already has.How Marketers Will ProfitIf you're thinking of how you can profit from Yahoo! Pipes as a marketer, there really are countless opportunities.[a] Provide highly relevant streams of content on your website to enrich the visitor experience.[b] Become a preferred access point to relevant and latest content in your industry.[c] Build applications that allow your visitors to easily access the content they're interested in.[d] Take your business intelligence activities to the next level. And much much more ...With all the capabilities available through Yahoo! Pipes, countless new opportunities will certainly arise quickly.The best part is, you can now more easily take advantage of them.

http://www.protect-x.com/

What Will Stop Comment Spam?

Visit a new Protect-X Sponsors section!

by Lorelle VanFossen
There is a growing movement to put the “follow” back into blog comment links instead of the nofollow attribute. The reason behind this move is to encourage readers to comment by rewarding their links with SEO credits.
The idea behind the nofollow technique was to take away all the “link juice” comment spammers wanted, thus encouraging them to stop spamming. Google introduced the nofollow tag to discourage comment spam from flooding their search indexes, and blogging programs added it to avoid being penalized and jump on the anti-comment spam bandwagon. WordPress and many blogging programs and forums added a nofollow by default for all links within comment areas. This instructed search engines not to follow the link as they crawled the page, taking away the credit search engine page rank gives to incoming and outgoing links. Recently, while late to the party, in an effort to discourage comment spam, Wikipedia has added nofollow to their outgoing links.
As good as the intention was, nofollow didn’t work then, and it won’t work now.
As many serious bloggers started realizing that their blog comments were also being penalized along, grouped as they were with evil comment spammers, a small backlash ensued. Protesting against the nofollow, the No NoFollow group and other bloggers spread the word on the SEO-killing aspect of the nofollow and encouraged bloggers to stop using nofollow. No nofollow WordPress Plugins that removes the nofollow from WordPress blog comments started appearing, as well as WordPress Plugins to include nofollow.
As bloggers debated the issue, including some bloggers taking a public stand on the nofollow issue, declaring their blogs to be “nofollow free”, the death toll is ringing on the nofollow issue.
It didn’t work then, and it isn’t working now.
As more and more bloggers removed the nofollow feature on their blogs, they wanted people to know that they were “good bloggers” and that leaving comments on their blogs meant the commenter would be rewarded with a link back to their site and to whatever sites they linked to in their comments. Many thought that this would free some bond restricting people from commenting on their blogs by offering a reward with a link credit.
This also doesn’t work.
Honestly, do you debate over whether or not to comment on a blog based upon whether or not the blog uses nofollow? Do you only seek out blogs which don’t use nofollow and comment only there? Unless it is publicly plastered near the comment form area, how would you even know? People are going to comment whether or not you use nofollow. A nofollow reward really doesn’t influence them. Does it really influence you to comment?
If it did influence people to comment, then why aren’t we all announcing it in order to get more comments on our blogs? Because our readers really don’t care one way or the other. If they want to comment, they’ll comment.
Still, the the issue here is stopping comment spam. And so far, nofollow isn’t working. So why bother?
What Are Bloggers Doing to Stop Comment Spam
Bloggers have resorted to a wide range of techniques to stop comment spammers. These make many feel great because they work initially, but over the long term, you and your readers are the only ones punished. In addition to the nofollow issue, some of these include:
Stopping all comments: This is pretty drastic and certainly stops comments, but takes away one of the biggest reasons to have a blog.
Make readers jump through hoops to comment: If you test the person leaving a comment, and they answer correctly, they must be human. Not. CAPTCHAs and other torture tests don’t work. Some comment spam bots can break through easily, hammering away at the post and your database whether or not they can get through. And human comment spammers certainly know how to add up 3+1.
Require registration: Many believe that by requiring registration for comments, comment spammers are stopped because they can’t get past the registration access. Not true. There are some sophisticated comment spam bots out there that are experts at breaking registration and password requirements. With the arrival of human comment spammers, bypassing registration is easy.
Strip links from comments: By removing all links, you totally take the “link juice” out of comments, right? This doesn’t stop comment spammers. I’ve found blogs which use this technique stuffed with horrible comment spam. No links, but still announcements of sex, porn, and casinos flood their comments. The only ones hurt by this technique are those who want to recommend a site or make a point with a link in the comments. Comment spammers continue to flood obliviously to whether or not their spam links work.
Rename the comments template file: This was a hot technique a couple years ago. It’s a temporary fix, though. Comment spammers find the new template file and the onslaught begins again.
Separating comments to another page: Comment spammers find comments no matter how far they are separated from the post. The problem with this technique is that your readers have to click through to even see the comments, and click back to read the post, and back to the comments, and back to the post, and…it doesn’t work for anyone.
It often feels like there is a new gimmick out every other week guaranteed to stop comment spam on your blog. People swear by them, but they only test them for a couple weeks before making the proclamation. Ask them if it still works three months from now.
Then ask them what their readers and potential commenters think about their new comment spam stopping technique.
Anything that gets between your blog and the reader and commenter hurts your blog and does nothing to stop comment spam.
What Works to Stop Comment Spam on Blogs?
The only thing working currently is using an effective comment spam fighting program behind the scenes such as Akismet. There are a variety of other good comment spam fighting plugins and add-ons that also work, but Akismet is currently the most popular and is available for a variety of different blog and forum programs.
Akismet works with the notion of a community of comment spam fighters: bloggers and forum users. If we all work together to mark which comments are comment spam, and the information is passed on to a central database, the comment spam you mark today will be prevented on my blog tomorrow.
When you make comment spam monitoring and marking part of your daily blogging routine, you help everyone benefit by stopping all the new types of comment spam as it arrives. Comment spammers are devious, always coming up with new ways to try to slip by the filters with their comments and trackback spam.
Have respect for your readers so they aren’t assaulted by comment spam on your blog. Care enough to keep your blog comment spam free?
Is there anything else you can do?
What Will Stop Comment Spammers?
All bloggers can do is trap and prevent comment spam from releasing on their blogs and forums. None of these techniques actually stop comment spam. According to recent statistics, spam via email and blog comment spam represents over 90% of all Internet traffic. According to Akismet comment spam statistics for blogs:
As of February 27, 2007804,559,720 spams caught so far6,909,637 so far today95% of all comments are spam
Comment spam has risen dramatically within the past six months. Our blogs are flooded with comment spam and hammered by spam bots not because our blogging programs can’t handle it, but because there is more comment spam attacks out there than ever before. It’s not stopping. It’s growing.
Comment spammers are obviously making money because many are opening up warehouse factories of human comment spammers in low income and third world countries to spam the world.
Someone’s paying them.
Someone’s paying them and someone’s making money from this. The key to stopping them is to stop the flow of money.
Since Akismet and the blogosphere is taking the fight seriously to stop comment spam from clogging their blogs, aren’t comment spammers paying attention? Don’t they understand that their messages aren’t getting through?
Ah, but they are. Most blogs do not have any form of comment stopping feature. There are millions of defunct blogs sitting on the web right now with no human nor machine to clean out the comment spam. Comment spammers are getting exposure because we are lazy and give up too easily.
If you have a defunct blog, or have ignored yours for too long, go in and clean out the comment spam. At the least, remove all capability to leave comments. Ask the host for help if you don’t know how. At the most, delete the blog. Don’t let comment spammers make money off your blog, whether or not you do.
Put pressure on the business world to not use comment spam as a method of advertising. Make it an ugly technique. Ask yourself, would you do business with a comment spammer? Find out if the company you work for or with uses comment spam for their advertising methods and let them know you think this is an abusive and underhanded method.
Let your opinion be known, even if you support comment spam. Let’s publicly debate about the value of comment spam to get the news out across the blogosphere. Together, we can use our collective voices to let our message ring out, so maybe comment spammers might hear us. They certainly aren’t listening now.
We need to put an end to comment spam. But how? The battle is being fought in the blogosphere but we need to move the front to the businesses so they can get on the defensive. And lose money. Let’s hit them in the wallet.

http://www.protect-x.com/

Stats From Leading Windows Security Provider Show Trojan-Downloader.Zlob.Media-C Continues to Be Most Prevalent Threat in 2007

Visit a new Protect-X Sponsors section!

CLEARWATER, FL - Sunbelt Software, a leading provider of Windows security software, today announced the top ten most prevalent spyware threats for the month of February. The results are based on monthly scans performed by Sunbelt's award-winning antispyware product, CounterSpy(TM).
The top ten most prevalent spyware threats for the month of February are:
1. Trojan-Downloader.Zlob.Media-C 2.44%
2. Trojan.FakeAlert 1.32%
3. Virtumonde 0.68%
4. Zango.CommonElements 0.40%
5. WinSpy 0.40%
6. Zango.SearchAssistant 0.39%
7. SpySheriff 0.39%
8. Command Service 0.38%
9. 180solutions.SearchAssistant 0.33%
10. Trojan-Downloader.Gen 0.33%
Trojan-Downloader.Zlob.Media-Codec
Trojan-Downloader.Zlob.Media-Codec is a trojan that installs rogue security software on the infected machine without notice and consent. It purports to be a needed codec or upgrade to Windows Media Player when users attempt to watch certain adult/porn videos to trick the user into downloading it. Once downloaded, it contacts remote servers and initiates the download of rogue security software such as SpywareQuake.
Trojan.FakeAlert
This program is used to trick the affected user into purchasing certain security applications. Trojan.FakeAlert will display false warnings that the computer is infected and uses a fake Windows update globe to trick the user into thinking that Microsoft Windows is reporting a spyware infection. Clicking on this notification directs the user to a pre-defined website to order malware removal software.
Virtumonde
Virtumonde is an adware program that displays pop-up advertisements on the desktop and also downloads other software from various remote servers. There are many variants of Virtumonde, some with trojan-like behaviors including downloading other software without notice and consent, transmitting information to remote servers without notice and consent, and lowering system security on the infected machine.
Zango.CommonElements
Zango.CommonElements is a collection of traces that are found in multiple adware programs from 180solutions and includes files and registry keys present in more than one 180solutions/Zango application.
WinSpy
WinSpy is a surveillance tool that allows the user to monitor activities of all users on the machine. It tracks browser history, Internet cache, cookies, most recently used documents (MRUs), search history, recently run programs, and open/save dialogues.
Zango.SearchAssistant
Zango.SearchAssistant opens new browser windows showing websites based on the previous websites you visit. The adware will run in the background on a computer and will periodically direct users to other sponsors' websites, allowing users to compare prices between websites.
SpySheriff
SpySheriff is a purported antispyware application to scan for and remove spyware from users' computers. SpySheriff is known to be distributed through exploits that also download adware or spyware on users' computers without notice or consent. When SpySheriff is downloaded through an exploit, it puts a red icon in the system tray and shows a false warning that the computer is infected with spyware.
Command Service
Command Service is an adware application that opens pop-ups and displays various types of advertising on the user's desktop while browsing web pages. Command Service is installed by a number of drive-by downloaders, including IE-Plugin.
180solutions.SearchAssistant
An adware application that monitors users' search queries and web surfing in order to display targeted advertising, 180solutions.Search Assistant opens new browser windows on the user's desktop based on search keywords and browser activity. The user's browsing history and search queries are monitored and transmitted to 180solutions' server in order to show ads, usually pop-ups.
Trojan-Downloader.Gen
Trojan-Downloader.Gen is a trojan downloader typically installed through an exploit or some other deceptive means that facilitates the download and installation of other malware and unwanted software onto a victim's PC.

http://www.protect-x.com/

Friday, March 02, 2007

ICANN May Allow Domain Owners to Keep More Info Confidential

Visit a new Protect-X Sponsors section!

by Q. Boyer
CYBERSPACE -- According to a report in the National Law Journal, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) will review at a meeting his month a report on the contentious question of “how much is too much?” when it comes to the information that domain registrants must publicly disclose – information currently available via a standard “Whois” query.On the one side of the debate, the side seeking greater privacy and confidentiality for domain registrants, stand privacy advocates, who argue that web site owners ought to have the option of keeping more of their contact information out of the public view. Those that argue for greater confidentiality also observe that many countries have enacted much more stringent privacy laws than has the U.S., so a shift in ICANN policy towards less disclosure would be more appropriate to the global nature of both the internet and ICANN, itself.On the other side of the debate stand many lawyers that specialize in intellectual property law, many of whom represent companies with widely known names, brands and trademarks that need to be protected from online infringement.The debate over Whois confidentiality has been going on within ICANN for years now, and one thing that members of the ICANN board do appear to agree on is that some sort of decisive action must be taken, and taken soon.“It’s become really contentious,” Rita Rodin, an attorney with the New York firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom who is also a member of the ICANN board told the Journal. “There will need to be action on this, this year.”A council assembled by ICANN will consider the report at a meeting this month, and the ICANN board is expected to act on the council’s recommendations as early as June.According to the Journal, ICANN is considering three options: “Continue to let domain name owners’ personal, technical and administrative contact information be viewed by all internet users; display only the name and country of an owner and allow that person or entity to designate additional information for a point of contact; or keep the current system and allow owners to cloak contact information only if there’s a risk to a registrant’s personal safety.”Judging by the comments coming from either side of the debate, the conflict appears to boil down to an issue of intellectual property rights vs. the privacy rights of individuals and companies that register domains.Attorney Steven Weinberg, who works on cases involving intellectual property rights enforcement for the law firm Greenberg Traurig, told the Journal that the information currently available through Whois queries is crucial for those that handle the legal issues that surround domain names.“There are so many transactions and legal issues involved with domain names that it becomes important for people in business to know who owns them,” Weinberg said.If ICANN adopts a policy that affords more privacy to domain registrants, attorneys like Weinberg will have to spend more money and time to ferret out the sort of information that is currently readily available through a quick and easy Whois query.Weinberg said that not being able to access contact information via Whois queries would also reduce the opportunity to settle intellectual property disputes before they become courtroom battles, something he said he’s often able to do by contacting domain owners using the information available through Whois queries.Other attorneys told the Journal that the frequency of infringement makes a more information-packed Whois result a powerful time-saving tool for businesses and their attorneys. Steve Metalitz, who sits on the ICANN council that will meet this month to discuss the issue, said that Ebay uses Whois queries as many as 100 times per day to contact websites that are infringing on the company’s rights or using the Ebay name without permission.On the other side of the fence, civil liberties and privacy advocates argue that the privacy rights typically available to individuals and businesses in the offline world shouldn’t be forfeited or curtailed online.“This affects an enormous amount of people,” said Robin Gross, an attorney with the civil liberties group IP Justice. “If the status quo is maintained, it really sort of cements that consumers have lost any sort of privacy.”Milton Mueller, a professor from the Syracuse University School of Information Studies, said in his comments to the ICANN council considering the issue that they only way to shield domain name owners from is to allow them to keep information private. Mueller likened it to the option that consumers have to have an unpublished phone number.Mueller asserted that allowing so much information to be reported via Whois queries has exposed millions of domain owners to “spamming and the risk of stalking, identity theft and unjustified harassment and surveillance by intellectual property lawyers.”Mueller added that the problem has “festered too long,” and agreed with Rodin and others that say ICANN must address the question as immediately as possible.“It’s really the last chance to reach consensus,” Mueller said.

http://www.protect-x.com/

New Watermark Helps Detect Copyright Infringement Online

Visit a new Protect-X Sponsors section!

BEAVERTON, Ore. — The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has issued a patent to Digimarc Corporation for a software application that uses watermarks to scour the Internet for unauthorized content and report violations to the rights holder.
According to Digimarc CEO Bruce Davis, the patent covers an as yet unnamed application that the company is working on to solve copyright issues posed by user-generated content and social networking sites such as YouTube and MySpace.
The ideas protected by the Digimarc patent would allow content producers to embed contact information in their material in the same way photographers use watermarks, Davis said.
“Digital watermarking — and, in particular, the innovations described in this newly issued patent — can be an important element of building long-term viable business models from the disruptive changes in entertainment distribution and consumption that have evolved, as embodied most strikingly in social networking sites,” Davis said.
Davis said he thinks Digimarc’s patent could not only help copyright holders protect their material online, but also allow for content producers to find new revenue streams on social networking sites.
“Much of the repurposed content on YouTube, for example, contains copyrighted entertainment,” he said. “If social networking sites implemented software to check each stream, they could identify copyrighted subject matter, create a report, negotiate compensation for the value chain and sell targeted advertising for related goods and services. The specific identification of the content could guide provision of related goods, services and community designed to maximize the consumer’s enjoyment of the entertainment experience.”
In practice, the system would work only if players in each part of the distribution chain used the system, ArsTechnica writer Ken Fisher said.
But Fisher cautioned, the system is best suited for sites such as YouTube rather than file-sharing sites because the application scans public webpages, not P2P networks.
The patent is entitled, “Method For Monitoring Internet Dissemination Of Image, Video and/or Audio Files.”

http://www.protect-x.com/

Israel Moves to Restrict Internet Porn

Visit a new Protect-X Sponsors section!

JERSELUM — Members of the Knesset, Israel’s parliament, gave preliminary approval to a bill that would require Internet service providers to restrict access to websites with adult content.
The bill, which calls on ISPs to block minors from accessing adult websites that contain sex, violence or gambling, moved through the Knesset with unanimous support. Only one lawmaker from the 25-member body abstained.
According to the language of the bill, access to adult websites would require physical or biometric age verification in addition to a password.
The bill’s sponsor, Amnon Cohen, said newer computers have the capability to institute his proposal.
Cohen said he proposed the bill because of national studies concluding that 60 percent of Israeli children between the ages of 9 and 18 have seen porn online.
The legislation also calls for a fine of nearly $5,000 for ISPs that fail to comply.
Absent from the bill is a definition of how sites would be classified as adult. Nor does the bill contemplate the technical or financial feasibility of its requirements.
“The bill's definitions are flawed and it constitutes a violation of the right for privacy and freedom of speech,” said Dr. Michael Birnhack of Haifa University's Faculty of Law. “The bill does not define what is a site that deals with sex, and so it would appear that it is also meant to block access to sites explaining about human sexuality, open sex, gay and lesbian sites, or sites explaining about martial arts because they deal with violence.”
Birnhack said there is no practical way to develop a working definition to determine which sites should be blocked under the law.
Birnhack also said he was troubled by privacy issues raised by the bill.
“Constitutional rights enable us to surf to any site we please, and it's nobody's business where we surf to,” he said.

http://www.protect-x.com/

Website immunity spreads with impunity

Visit a new Protect-X Sponsors section!

By Kevin Fayle in San Francisco
MySpace.com, Google, Microsoft and Lycos have all benefited from decisions entered in the latter part of the month which confirmed or adopted the broad grant of immunity that many US courts have extended to operators of "interactive computer services" under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
It is fairly well established now that interactive computer service providers are not liable for information transmitted over their service by another. In the plain vanilla case of a person suing a website or ISP for defamation based on a message board posting by a third party, judges hardly even finish reading the complaint before granting judgment for the defendant.
That's essentially what happened in the case of Eckert v. Microsoft. A man sued the Redmond giant claiming that Microsoft owed him money for refusing to remove defamatory posts about him on a Microsoft-run message board, and for delaying the deactivation of the link between his message board account and his work email.
The magistrate judge, whose recommendations the district court judge adopted, was kind to Mr. Eckert since he had represented himself - and therefore had no idea that his lawsuit was doomed from the start - but the short, methodical dissection of his arguments belied the fact that the magistrate was probably hiding a snicker or two as he was writing it.
Most cases like this never get filed anymore, so it's interesting just to see one in the wild. The other notable aspect is that the magistrate judge came to his conclusions based on interpretations of Section 230 from other jurisdictions, which suggests that the broad grant of immunity has indeed become the de facto norm, even though some courts have limited the immunity somewhat.
Variations on the ordinary Section 230 theme are more common these days. For instance, parents of a 14-year old girl who was sexually assaulted by a man she met on MySpace.com sued the social networking site for negligence in failing to protect their daughter from contact by sexual predators. The plaintiffs insisted that the claim of negligence removed their suit from the Section 230 realm, since they were suing over MySpace's policies, and not the content of postings on the site.
The judge in the case, however, held in February that the girl and her assailant never would have met if MySpace hadn't published their communications, thus the plaintiffs' claims were aimed at MySpace in its publishing capacity. Under the Section 230 jurisprudence cited by the court, this entitled MySpace to Section 230 immunity and dismissal of the plaintiffs' case.
This ruling could have a great impact on other lawsuits involving sexual predator abuse on MySpace, either by influencing other judges to dismiss, or by shaping the claims that plaintiffs make against the site. Since this is a district court, other courts won't necessarily have to follow its logic, but MySpace's arguments for dismissal will be much more persuasive with some legal precedent behind them. Plus, any further negligence suits against MySpace in this district will now be barred based on rules of issue preclusion.
Google, Microsoft (again) and Yahoo! also benefited from another original application of the Section 230 immunity in February. A man sued the two companies after they refused to place contextually-based ads for the man's gripe sites within their search results. The judge dismissed this "must-carry" suit (except for a breach of contract claim against Google) after finding that the decision whether or not to place the ads constituted an exercise of editorial discretion that activated Section 230.
Part of the law states that information service providers won't be liable for decisions about monitoring, screening or deleting content. Citing this portion of the statute, the judge dismissed all claims relating to the companies' decisions to reject the ads. Essentially, the companies had screened access to the plaintiff's objectionable ad content, and therefore the decision to reject the ads was immune from suit.
This could affect other current and potential lawsuits against search engines, since the court's reasoning could apply equally well to decisions to exclude websites in search results, or to rank certain websites higher than others based on inscrutably complicated and annoyingly inaccessible algorithms.
The Section 230 decision issued in February that has the most precedential effect (since it was rendered by an appellate court) involved securities claims, of all things. The plaintiff, Universal Communication Systems, a publicly-traded company, sued Lycos over false statements about the company's financial health made in postings to RagingBull.com, a financially-oriented site that Lycos operated at all times relevant to the lawsuit.
The 1st Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of the claims against Lycos based on Section 230, holding that claims under Florida securities law treated Lycos as the publisher of information posted by third-parties. The court rejected plaintiff's claims that Lycos was actually the publisher of the information (and therefore not immune under Section 230), noting that other courts (most recently in this case from the California Supreme Court) have determined that notice of the unlawful nature of the third-party information does not turn it into the provider's own speech.
The plaintiff also floated an active inducement theory that it claimed should destroy Section 230 immunity. This theory was based on the Grokster case, and tried to create liability by claiming that Lycos had invited the misstatements, even though its terms of use directed users to abide by state and federal securities law.
The court shot this theory down by noting, appropriately, that nothing in the statute creates an exception for active inducement. Even if it did, the court said, Lycos had done nothing close to the behavior necessary to trigger liability for active inducement.
With this decision, the 1st Circuit threw its hat in with the other appellate circuits that have interpreted Section 230 broadly. As noted above, some other circuits have lessened the immunity somewhat, so the issue may end up before the Supreme Court eventually. For now, however, the weight of the appellate decisions rests with the broad immunity camp.
So, all-in-all, a big month for Section 230 immunity for websites based on third-party content. As these decisions continue to come out, and the subject matter of the immunity continues to expand, the protections for interactive websites should only become stronger, and the types of services available to web users more varied. Amazingly, this is the exact idea that Congress had when it passed Section 230 over a decade ago. Who woulda thought, right?
Just a little something to keep all you Web 2.0 acolytes warm in bed tonight.®

http://www.protect-x.com/

Yahoo! false! alert! drama!

Visit a new Protect-X Sponsors section!

By John Leyden
Faulty signature updates on Wednesday resulted in Symantec's anti-virus packages falsely identifying that Yahoo! mail was contaminated by malware.
The webmail service, currently in beta, was wrongly labelled as being contaminated by the Feebs worm as a result of the snafu.
Symantec published a signature update later on Wednesday that resolved the problem.
Updates to security software signatures can occasionally result in false alarms against legitimate applications, a problem far from confined to Symantec. For example, in November Microsoft's Windows Live OneCare warned that Gmail was infected by malware.
And in February 2006, an update to Microsoft anti-spyware incorrectly labelled two versions of Symantec's anti-virus software as Trojan horse malware. ®

http://www.protect-x.com/

Thursday, March 01, 2007

Judge Rules Google Can Block Ads

Visit a new Protect-X Sponsors section!

WILMINGTON, Del. — In a ruling that could have far-reaching affects for online advertisers, a federal judge has said search engine giant Google can refuse ads as it sees fit.
U.S. District Court Judge Joseph Farnan dismissed a suit filed by Christopher Langdon against Google, Yahoo and Microsoft. In the suit, Langdon claimed that all three had stifled his right to free speech by refusing to publish his ads. The ads in questions promoted several websites critical of both North Carolina politicians and the Chinese government.
“Search engines have a 1st Amendment right to reject ads as part of their protected right to speak or not,” Farnan wrote.
The ruling invoked a 1974 decision — Miami Herald vs. Tornillo — that gave newspapers the right to refuse to carry ads.
Eric Goldman, director of the Santa Clara University School of Law’s High Tech Law Institute, said the ruling would help search engines in future legal disputes over ads.
“It's an emphatic and helpful win for the search engines,” he said. “Langdon is a griper. He sought to buy ads on the major search engines to advance his gripes. As expected, the judge emphatically shut down Langdon’s lawsuit, calling some of his claims ‘specious’ and ‘frivolous.’”
Google spokesman Ricardo Reyes said the company was pleased with the ruling, adding that the decision affirms the search engine’s right to enforce its own long-standing ad policy.
In his complaint, Langdon, who represented himself, said that Google had not said which, if any, of the company’s policies his ads violated. The ruling affirmed Google’s decision not to specify precisely how Langdon’s ads failed to comply.
“This will save Google time and frustration,” said Dana Todd, president of the Search Engine Marketing Professional Organization. “They can just invoke that standard sign over the cash register: ‘We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone.’”
Media and technology attorney Jon Hart said the ruling shouldn’t be a surprise to sophisticated online advertisers, but it will ease burdens on the search engine from numerous, smaller plaintiffs around the country.
“Next time, the defendant will pull up a copy of this opinion,” Hart said. “Google is not the public square, it is a media company.”
Attorney J.D. Obenberger told XBIZ the ruling affirms what many in the online world — adult and mainstream — already know: That websites are private property.
“We’ve always known that websites, even big ones like Google, own their own pages,” Obenberger said. “Websites aren’t licensed by government, like radio or TV, and it would astound me if a court said someone had the right to force Google to carry an ad.”

http://www.protect-x.com/